Honduras: COPINH’s Objective is to Deprive Fair Trial Rights


The following press release was distributed to media on 25 October 2018:

Over this past weekend, the private accusers representing the family of the late Berta Cáceres, and Gustavo Castro, who have the same attorneys as the Consejo Cívico de Organizaciones Populares e Indígenas de Honduras (COPINH), were barred from future participation in the ongoing trial after they did not show up for its start.

This was done per the prosecution and defense’s request in accordance with the procedures provided for by Honduran criminal procedure when a private accuser abandons a case. The COPINH had several times postponed the beginning of the trial with legally baseless motions.

“Let there be no doubt that COPINH has just shown the world that they are much more concerned about preventing a fair trial and than they are about achieving true justice, and it’s a disgrace to the memory of Berta Cáceres,” said Robert Amsterdam, international counsel for Desarollos Energeticos (DESA), the hydroelectric company whose two executives are among the accused standing trial. “Every action they have taken – culminating with this calculated ploy – has sought to violate presumption of innocence, to convert the process into a propaganda exercise, and to please their Western donors to continue fighting against economic development and jobs for regular Hondurans.”

This development comes the wake of several recent discoveries that suggest that both the public and private prosecution neglected, withheld and distorted available exculpatory evidence which sheds grave doubts on their charges against Sergio Rodriguez and David Castillo.

According to recently released evidence, the day of her death, Cáceres had been in contact with a Swiss journalist with whom she shared her fears regarding violent threats from a mining company – evidence which has been totally ignored in the media coverage. The text messages also show that COPINH would manipulate the media and NGOs by busing in fake supporters from outside the area.

Mr. Amsterdam explains that he believes that COPINH has left the process because “its aims have nothing to do with finding the actual culprits, nor do they care about the constitutional rights of the accused.” Those rights, says Mr. Amsterdam, are being violated every time COPINH files another frivolous motion before the court which appears only designed to postpone the trial.

Amsterdam & Partners LLP intends very soon to publish a white paper which will address all the facts regarding this case.